Car Research

The 2009 Lancer Ralliart Sportback has the bite to back up its bark. It has a great combination of performance, style and utility. Yes, it takes high test fuel and, no, it's not Mitsubishi's benchmark performance model but if you haven't driven one, you won't even know what you're missing. (Shaun Keenan/AUTONET)
Related article
The Sportback Ralliart gives you crisp Evo-like steering that's responsive and quick, lightweight and precise. The tilt-only steering wheel could be a nuisance for taller drivers, but fine for my average 5-10 frame. (Shaun Keenan/AUTONET)
Related article
With the rear seat backs folded down, cargo volume in the Lancer Sportback goes from 390-litres (13.8 cu.-ft.) to 1,320-litres (46.6 cu.-ft.), which is more than the WRX265 (1,257-litres) and Mazdaspeed3 (1,229-litres) have. In the upright position, however, the others offer a bit more volume – 467 and 538 litres, respectively – as a result of the Mitsu's more aggressive rear glass angle. (Shaun Keenan/AUTONET)
Related article
The Lancer Sportback's acceleration is spirited. It's not as quick as in Evo – which further benefits from a launch control system – but it's actually smoother with the pedal fully down. There's noticeably less jerkiness and smoother gear shifts. (Shaun Keenan/AUTONET)
Related article
The Lancer Sportback's four-wheel independent suspension is definitely more comfortable when just cruising. It soaks up bumps well and isn't overly jarring – certainly more forgiving than an Evo, day-to-day. (Shaun Keenan/AUTONET)
Related article
Brakes could have more initial bite on the Lancer Sportback, but are good enough for the everyday stuff. My relatively short drive time and location didn't really allow for much abuse. The diameters of the front rotors are the same as on GTS, but they do get two-piston callipers to help improve efficiency. (Shaun Keenan/AUTONET)
Related article
The front-wheel drive Lancer GTS Sportback starts 10 grand below and gets a 2.4-litre Mivec engine (4B12) making 168 horsepower and 167 lb.-ft. through either a five-speed manual or CVT, both offering pretty decent fuel economy on 87 octane. (Shaun Keenan/AUTONET)
Related article
SUBSCRIBE or Unsubscribe