'Plain Jane' Saturn SL1 is beautifully executed

Glen Woodcock, Toronto Sun
Published: 19 11 2001

-from the Toronto Sun's DriverSource
People often give their cars names: some of them earned, others whimsical. For instance, a friend from long ago called his decrepit oil-burner "Old Smoky." Saturday Sun columnist Rachel Sa has hung the name "Ooter" on her pea green VW Beetle.

I've never been one to indulge in the habit, but if I owned this week's test car, a 2002 Saturn SL1 sedan, I know what I'd call it.

Plain Jane.

The unobtrusive little Saturn was remarkable for the commotion it caused for the week it was parked overnight in my driveway.

"Well, that's certainly dull enough," said my wife.

"What a boring little car," echoed my 18-year-old daughter, who's grown accustomed to dad bringing home a line of much more exotic machinery. (Although that wouldn't have been the reaction if I'd brought it home with her name on it.)

Actually, I like the mild facelift the S-series was given back in model year 2000, so I found myself vigorously coming to its defence.

Perhaps if it had been a colour other than ubiquitous silver with a grey interior?

I'd think of it as a car for minimalists, except our test Saturn came with a long list of features than would have been unheard of in a compact sedan a mere decade ago.

No, it didn't have leather seats or alloy wheels with low-profile performance radials, but neither was it an econobox, despite its sticker price of just over $18,000.

In fact, our test car, an SL1 Sport Sedan came with power windows/door locks/outside mirrors plus remote keyless entry as no-cost extra equipment. And that's in addition to standard features such as a four-speed automatic transmission, power steering and brakes, AM-FM stereo with in-dash CD player and an adjustable steering column. (But no cruise control!)

Plus, of course, you get Saturn's trademark dent-resistant polymer panels on all vertical body surfaces and a rugged space frame construction, making it one of the safest small cars around. And in addition to reduced force air bags for driver and front passenger, a head-curtain air bag is now optional for even more front occupant protection.

It's been a long time since we'd done a road test of the S-Series sedan and we were pleasantly surprised that some of the changes we'd noticed on SC coupes in the last few years also are evident on the four-door model.

First and foremost are the improvements Saturn engineers have made to the four-cylinder 1.9-litre SOHC engine. The noise reduction features begun in model year 1997 and then continued in 1999 have made for a much quieter and smoother powertrain. Although still not in the league of a Toyota Corolla, the base Saturn engine (optional is a 1.9 with double overhead cams and 124 hp) no longer assaults your eardrums when the revs climb past 3,000.

It's just as economical as ever, though. Transport Canada estimates the fuel economy to be 5.8 L/100 km on the highway and 8.7 in the city. Our real world test fell in line with those projections as we averaged 7.1 L/100 km in combined highway-city driving.

Putting out just 100 hp and 114 lb.ft. of torque, the SL1 was one of the slowest cars we've tested recently, ambling from zero to 100 km/h in 13.3 seconds and taking 10.5 seconds to go from 80 to 120 km/h. A Sport Sedan in name only.

Still, if blinding speed isn't a priority, the SL1 is pleasant to drive.

It's a nice size, and combined with just about the best outward vision of any car – big or small – it's easy to park and drive. The gauges are uncomplicated and easy to read at a glance, the controls straightforward and easy to use with big, round knobs for the stereo and heater (although the heater/AC controls could be less mushy and a little more precise).

In short, this is a car anyone can drive and a car any dad would trust his kids with.

Satisfied with the mechanical improvements and facelift given the S-Series in recent years, Saturn has chosen to stand pat for 2002. You know that's true when the big news for 2002 is new wheel covers on SL2 models.

May I then suggest a few minor changes for 2003?

First, add some kind of driver armrest so you don't keep hitting the power window switches with your right hand. Then, put a light on the floor-mounted gear selector. Either that, or add a dash indicator. As it is, you can't tell what gear you're in at night. And tone down the seat-belt reminder chimes, among the loudest we've encountered in recent experience.

Other than that, don't change a thing. Not every car needs to be a dragster; not every driver wants to get from A to B as quickly as possible.

Fuel economy, longevity and value for money are still automotive virtues worth pursuing.

Boring is only in the eye of the beholder.

More Reviews

Test Drives

Kia bares its Soul to youthful buyers

Used Models

Saturn is now an orphan brand

Test Drives

Prius V expands on hybrid sensibilities

Test Drives

Special Boxster's back in Black

Test Drives

The business casual approach to a work truck

Test Drives

Fiat raises the cute factor by 500

SUBSCRIBE or Unsubscribe