Cadillac CTS may be art, but it isn't performance art

Joe Duarte
Published: 02 08 2002

Cadillac enters its second century with a handful of ultra-luxury vehicles and perhaps the most distinctive styling in the industry.

The vehicle that perhaps garnered the most attention was the made-in-the-USA Catera-replacement CTS. A completely new vehicle meant to challenge the best from Europe, in styling and performance, and to signal the resurgence of Cadillac with some bold innovative products entering the market over the coming years.

Whether it accomplished that or not is a matter of opinion. Personally, I prefer the more timeless look of a BMW or Mercedes (though both of those companies are certainly taking more liberties with their classic lines). Time has shown that the "classics" tend to stay around longer, too (how many 1980 BMW 3 Series do you see compared to how many Cadillac Sevilles?).

Performance is also in question. Yes, it can run circles around some of what is coming out of Europe. Yes, its ride is puts many touring sedans to shame. Yes, its appointment level is a match for any luxury sedan anywhere. But, to my eyes, it doesn't quite pull it all together into a package that is superior to any one of its competitors.

For example: despite its size advantage, it can't match the power delivery of the Lexus IS 300 or its nimbleness. Similarly, the overall comfort and luxury levels of the Mercedes C240 are superior despite the power deficiencies and size. The rock-solid constitution of both the Jaguar X-TYPE and Audi A4 3.0 make them seem far more refined, offsetting the price and size advantages of the CTS. Even its closest rival, the Lincoln LS V6 is superior in size and scope despite a slight power disadvantage. And the Infiniti G35, Acura 3.2TL, Infiniti G35 and BMW 3 Series are just flat out superior in every way.

In fact the only advantage it really has overall is price, which has traditionally been the consistent North American edge. And although you can justify price versus features in other markets, the sport sedan buyer is less likely to pay attention. They want engine resonance, quick power delivery and sporty handling. And they want it wrapped up in a package that instantly conveys their sporting nature.

To that end, Cadillac got some things right with CTS. It used a rear-wheel drive architecture, which is the first thing buyers in this market look at. It fits a manual transmission into every model and gives them all a 5-speed automatic option. Although, the manual could have got six speeds and the automatic might have acquired a sequential shift mode …

CTS also has a sport version that adds stiffer suspension, 17-inch tires, high-efficiency braking and stability control. Yet, it is available at the top of the line, whereas most others create a lighter, sportier model with those attributes to appease sport sedan buyers' performance and price tastes.

The interior is upscale, definitive and ergonomically sound so that drivers can easily identify what needs attention and perform tasks without diverting too much attention from the road. Yet, the comfort level is still closer to the traditional North American plushness, rather than the European touring support.

So despite all the improvements, basically what you have in the CTS is just a very good Cadillac, but the brand needs to transcend that. It needs to build a car that is a match to its competitors and this one isn't. It's a great start and a good base for the future, but I think the world will soon learn to ignore CTS.

More Reviews

Test Drives

Kia bares its Soul to youthful buyers

Used Models

Saturn is now an orphan brand

Test Drives

Prius V expands on hybrid sensibilities

Test Drives

Special Boxster's back in Black

Test Drives

The business casual approach to a work truck

Test Drives

Fiat raises the cute factor by 500

SUBSCRIBE or Unsubscribe