Fashionably small, sensibly upscale

Joe Duarte
Published: 27 09 2004

For about the price of a Ford Escape, you could be driving one of the most respected nameplates in the history of go-anywhere motoring — Land Rover ... though it will be a vehicle very similar in size and ability to the Escape.

The Land Rover Freelander was created for the same reasons as most other compact utes — to get buyers into the SUV buying stream earlier on in their spending years. In the Freelander's case, though, it gets them into the Land Rover stable earlier ... and that isn't necessarily a bad thing.

Freelander is marginally larger than Escape in all exterior dimensions except wheelbase. But in direct contradiction, it is marginally inferior in all interior dimensions except overall legroom. The biggest impact is felt in headroom, where Freelander feels taller and its cabin more airy, than its distant cousin. The reason is a lower shoulder line that creates larger glass areas and makes the Land Rover interior feel larger than it really is.

It also makes it appear as if you're sitting more upright and higher up from the ground (when in reality, you're sitting about four and three-quarter inches closer to it). Seating is comfortable and positions are well defined. The flat surfaces seem as though they would not be very friendly on back for long trips, but the opposite is actually true. The driver sits the traditional "European" arm's-length away from the wheel, but its lower location doesn't have as much of a perceptual impact as on some passenger cars.

The lower floor also serves to bring the centre of gravity down to make the vehicle more stable, and to make it easier to step in and out, but may serve as a deterrent to the extreme off-road capabilities for which Land Rovers are famous. The shorter wheelbase emphasizes the choppiness common to trucks over everyday dips and ruts, and also sacrifices cargo room for the sake of legroom.

However, the biggest detriment may be power. Freelander is powered by a 2.5 V6 that makes 174 horsepower and 177 lbs.ft of torque (and that at a relatively high 4000 rpm). Sensible off-roading demands significant pull at relatively low engine speeds, and this obviously isn't the vehicle you'd choose to do it in.

Which again brings up the Ford connection — the Escape has more ground clearance, and a bigger V6 that provides more torque and horsepower (though again, higher up in the rev range). It leaves me to wonder why Ford would not adapt its obviously superior small ute (which is available to Mazda), rather than creating a unique inferior upscale mini-ute.

Regardless, Freelander is an interesting vehicle and does an admirable job at mixing off-road prowess and on-road smoothness in a truck chassis. In its abilities and presentation, it provides a worthy entrance to the world of Land Rover.

More Reviews

Test Drives

Kia bares its Soul to youthful buyers

Used Models

Saturn is now an orphan brand

Test Drives

Prius V expands on hybrid sensibilities

Test Drives

Special Boxster's back in Black

Test Drives

The business casual approach to a work truck

Test Drives

Fiat raises the cute factor by 500

SUBSCRIBE or Unsubscribe