2008 Land Rover LR2

2008 Land Rover LR2

More Photos

Photos by -Autonet.ca
Annette McLeod
Published: 13 08 2008

The median is the message

Somebody once said that writing is easy — all you have to do is sit at your desk until drops of blood form on your forehead.

Sometimes writing car reviews isn’t much better. There are vehicles that sing to you all the while you’re on the road, telling you exactly what to say in the nicest way possible.

Sometimes you drive something that makes you think, “well, I don’t hate it.”

Which brings me, circuitously, to the 2008 Land Rover LR2.

I liked its size. I liked its cachet. I liked its nifty two-bar grille design with the off-centre logo and the air vents ahead of the A-pillars. I liked the comfortable seats and the trunk space. I liked the wide window sills — the better for resting an arm, my dear.

I like ice cream and bunnies, too, but none of it moves me to wax rhapsodic.

The LR2 replaces the lacklustre Freelander in Land Rover’s lineup, and benefits from a Ford Europe chassis that gives it decent stability, as well as a Volvo-developed 3.2-litre inline-six that offers not-quite-horrifying gas mileage.

Land Rovers are more comfortable off-road than many mid-size SUVs. I didn’t get the chance to try it, which I’ll admit is not entirely fair to the brand — in this case, in the form of a Terrain Response system that maximizes traction via a variety of driver-selectable settings: grass/gravel/snow, mud/ruts and sand, or general for normal everyday driving. The system allows you to hold lower gears longer to manage your rpm, but it lacks a low-range setting or adjustable suspension.

The underside is well armoured and the approach and departure angles quite decent. It offers hill descent control and a dynamic stability system that’s easily disabled. It can also, claims Land Rover, attack five feet of water without worry.

In addition, there’s an all-wheel-drive system that detects wheel slip.

In suburbia and the Big Smoke, its handling was fine, and I give it points for cornering nicely flat and not having a lot of that floaty body-roll from which many tallish SUVs suffer. Ride quality was good over every surface I encountered, and the cabin was at all times virtually free of road and wind noise.

In spite of the 230 hp (at 6,300 rpm) and 234 lb.-ft. of torque offered by the engine, I didn’t find its performance terribly inspiring, but it does mean a towing capacity of nearly 3,500 lb. (1,585 kg), and the braking a little soft, although it did do well at last year’s Automobile Journalists Association of Canada (AJAC) TestFest, coming out on top with a full metre on its nearest competitor, the Infiniti EX (AJAC’s results bear out my opinion of its sluggish acceleration — it was slowest among all 11 entries).

Inside, the cabin of my tester was a utilitarian anti-design of all black, unremarkable gauges and controls that were easy enough to use and completely boring to look at. I don’t usually nit-pick to the point of font sizes on the gauges, but they’re really small, and really dullsville. The seats are quite comfortable and the back seat is too, once you get past the small rear doors. The rear seat’s theatre-style stance would be appreciated by regular passengers. Visibility is uniformly good. My tester featured a bit ol’ hole where the optional $3,200 nav system would have been, had it had one.

Controls are big and easily poked or grabbed with gloves on, just uninspiring to look at (although I do have a taste for a bit of glam — many will appreciate its stiff-upper-lip understatedness).

Exterior styling is distinctly Land Rover, which is to say bearing the clamshell hood and tall greenhouse. Fine and dandy, if you like that sort of thing.

I’ve read reviewers who complain about having to first insert the key fob, and then press a button to start it, but seriously, how lazy do you have to be? How is that any more onerous than inserting a key and then, uh, turning it? OK, a proximity keyfob would be nice, but jeez ...

Safety features are ample, with seven airbags including full-length curtain airbags and driver knee-protection airbag, emergency brake assist and roll stability control.

I know a few people who think the world of Land Rovers. OK, I know this one guy, but he’s a smart guy. Maybe “meh” is right up his alley.

Summary:

Year/Make/Model
2008 Land Rover LR2
Price as tested
$47,075
Trim level
HSE
Freight
$1,195
Options
lighting package ($1,200) includes bi-xenon headlights, adaptive front lighting system, approach & puddle lights, memory driver's seat and mirrors; telephone integration system with Bluetooth ($600); premium sound system ($375)
EnerGuide fuel economy ratings
13.3 L/100km city; 8.8 L/100km hwy
Observed fuel economy
12.7 L/100 km combined over 433 km
Competitors
Acura RDX, BMW X3, Buick Enclave, Infiniti EX, Subaru Tribeca, Toyota Highlander, Volvo XC70

Strong Points

Weak Points

  • - capable off-roader
  • - nice fit and finish
  • - good level of comfort and space
  • - boring interior
  • - uninspiring performance

Editors Rating:

Fuel consumption
Not as bad as I feared.
Value for price
Land Rover cachet and decent standard features.
Styling
Better outside than in.
Comfort
Good all around.
Performance
Meh.
overall
Much a matter of taste.

More Reviews

Test Drives

Kia bares its Soul to youthful buyers

Used Models

Saturn is now an orphan brand

Test Drives

Prius V expands on hybrid sensibilities

Test Drives

Special Boxster's back in Black

Test Drives

The business casual approach to a work truck

Test Drives

Fiat raises the cute factor by 500

SUBSCRIBE or Unsubscribe