2010 Chevrolet Camaro

2010 Chevrolet Camaro

More Photos

Photos by -Autonet.ca
Glen Woodcock
Published: 27 07 2009

Camaro draws comparisons and looks

The fifth generation Chevrolet Camaro comes in three models: base LS, with V6 and six-speed manual; two versions of V6-powered LT; and two versions of V8-powered SS.

Our Autonet test vehicle is an LT with Rally Sport package. With its six-cylinder engine and automatic transmission it might be tempting for some to dismiss the LT as a “chick car” but they’d be wrong.

The 3.6-litre V6 has variable valve timing and direct injection and is capable of turning loose 304 hp at 6,400 rpm and churning out 273 lb.-ft. of torque at 5,200.

Compare that to the six of the original 1967 Camaro, whose style this fifth-generation car copies. The original 230 cubic inch inline six was capable of just 140 hp while the famous 327 cu. in. small block V8 made 275 hp.

Even the LT1 Corvette V8, available in the fourth generation Z28 in 1992, made just 275 hp.

And as for the automatic, it’s not the clunky three- or four-speed unit of the past. Coupled to the 3.6-litre V6 is a thoroughly modern six-speed transmission with paddle-shifters mounted on the steering wheel.

According to General Motors, that drivetrain can rocket the Camaro from 0-60 mph (97 km/h) in 6.1 seconds. Not only that, with a quarter mile time of 14.5 seconds, the automatic beats the manual tranny by 0.2 seconds.

And when comparing it to the V8s of the first edition … well, there’s no comparison. In a Road & Track road test in March, 1967, an RS with a 327 and four-speed stick took over 9.0 seconds to go 0-60 and ran the quarter mile in 16.9 seconds. The May, 1967 issue of Motor Trend tested a 302 with a four-speed stick and it clocked 7.0 seconds from 0-60 and 14.8 seconds for the quarter.

So although it may not have the bad boy image of the V8, there’s more than enough power under the hood of the LT to get you in serious trouble with the gendarmes.

Weight distribution is 52:48, so the RWD car is nicely balanced, although you can make the rear end step out under full throttle in cornering.

No previous Camaro could comfortably accommodate adults in the back seat, and the new model is no exception. There’s not much legroom and headroom is inadequate for even average-size adults, so it’s still a place best suited for children. However, the entire seatback flips down to let you load items too long to fit into the 11.3-cubic foot trunk.

The big front buckets are great, and the power driver’s seat adjusts for height so even shorter operators can get a good view of the big, long hood – and the road ahead – without peeking through the spokes of the fat steering wheel. However, drivers of all sizes will find serious blind spots to the rear when backing up, and the undersized exterior mirrors aren’t much help.

The car certainly attracts a lot of attention – and smiles. A lot of people out there are pulling for the Camaro to be a success. Many commented on its size. Built on the same platform from GM’s Australian division as the Pontiac G8, it’s much bigger than it appears in photographs – especially when riding on the optional 20-inch rims.

And it seems everyone but me likes the retro placement of four gauges (oil pressure and temperature, voltmeter and transmission temperature) on the console behind the shifter. I find them too hard to read, requiring me to take my eyes off the road for too long.

Camaro sales have been strong, with more than 22,000 orders placed North America-wide, and the Oshawa assembly plant working overtime to keep up.

Summary:

Year/Make/Model
2010 Chevrolet Camaro
Price as tested
$36,540
Trim level
2LT
Price range
$26,995-$41,065
Freight
$1,350
Options
Rally Sport package ($1,705) includes body coloured roof ditch moulding, rear spoiler, 20-inch wheels with P245/45R20 front and P275/40R20 rear performance tires, HID headlamps, unique taillamps, RS badging; automatic transmission ($1,435); power sunroof ($1,195); polished aluminum wheels ($540).
EnerGuide fuel economy ratings
11.4 L/100km city; 6.9 L/100km hwy
Observed fuel economy
11.2L/100 km over 580 km
Warranty (basic)
3 years/60,000 km
Warranty (powertrain)
5 years/160,000 km
Competitors
Dodge Challenger; Ford Mustang; Hyundai Genesis Coupe

Strong Points

Weak Points

  • - drivetrain
  • - styling
  • - wonderful exhaust note
  • - rear vision
  • - rear seat
  • - fuel economy

Editors Rating:

Fuel consumption
not great if you drive it hard – and you will
Value for price
well equipped for less than $35K
Styling
just the right retro design cues
Comfort
terrific front seats
Performance
more than adequate acceleration for a V6
overall
could be the halo car GM needs right now

More Reviews

Test Drives

Mercedes C350 strikes heroic sport sedan stance

Test Drives

Cadillac SRX puts a premium on wagon

Test Drives

Lexus stakes luxury sport compact claim with...

Test Drives

Honda CR-V hasn't outgrown its britches

Test Drives

Best BMW 3 improves threefold on driving fun

Test Drives

Kia heads to Rio for sub-compact sedan competitor

Test Drives

Dodge Charger V6 is like a semi-Hemi

SUBSCRIBE or Unsubscribe