2010 Mazda6

2010 Mazda6

More Photos

Photos by -Autonet.ca
Joe Duarte
Published: 18 12 2009

Beyond the vanilla envelope

Many “driven” people will preach that you never stop striving for something greater but self-help coaches counter that by suggesting we look at what we already have before deciding what we want to change (and why are we coached on “self” help, anyway?).

Apparently shoppers in the mid-sized sedan segment follow the latter philosophy, and that’s why they nestle themselves into the sure comfort of a Honda Accord or Toyota Camry (and before that, a Ford Taurus) and stop exploring for what else, perhaps more exciting, may be out there.

And though by and large they get great vehicles they don’t have to think much about (allowing them to concentrate on other, perhaps more important aspects of their lives), they also tend to miss out on some great driving experiences … like with today’s test car, the Mazda6.

Mazda6 was a great leap forward for Mazda in 2003, when it replaced the smaller 626 in Mazda’s line-up. Like the 626, the Mazda6 shares architecture with Ford products (Probe, in the case of the 626; Fusion and Lincoln MKZ for the Mazda6).

Also like the 626, the Mazda6 was an instant star with the critics (winning several awards including 2004 and 2005 family car and 2005 wagon categories at AJAC’s Canadian Car of the Year) but was greeted less enthusiastically by the buying public.

The praise comes from superiority to its main rivals in terms of driving performance, handling and looks. Whereas Accord and Camry are continuously bashed for their vanilla presentations, Mazda pushes character through distinctive creases and flowing character lines. The Mazda6 looks like the muscular zero body-fat athlete, in relation to the others’ undefined couch-potato blandness.

There is a drawback to cutting out all the excess body wrapping – the cabin also becomes a little tighter for occupants in comparison to its main competition - a little, in relation to the Accord; a lot to Camry. Even the Chevrolet Malibu, which faces similar challenges in dealing with the vanilla warriors, has the edge over Mazda6 in interior roominess.

In terms of comfort, though, Mazda6 offers up nicely contoured, well padded seating for four with a good rear centre position for a smaller passenger, which is pretty much the acceptable standard in the segment. A short deck lid hides a spacious trunk that will suit all family cargo needs, with a 60/40 pass-through to the cabin for the excesses.

But the Mazda6 performance more than makes up for its slight limitations in room. Our test GT’s 3.7-litre V6’s outputs surpass those of the 3.5s in Accord, Camry and Nissan’s Altima, as well as the Ford Fusion’s 3.0 and Malibu’s 3.6 V6s. As with most performance intenders, fuel economy suffers and it isn’t surprising Mazda6 trails this field (by a lot in relation to Malibu).

Power comes on strong from launch, and builds smoothly effortlessly right up the rpm range, thanks to a nicely progressive six-speed automatic that features sequential gear control. It’s able to keep things docile and subdued during most everyday chores while encouraging active participation (there’s that athletic involvement again) from its driver for peak performance.

Combine it with a fully independent suspension, and you end up with athletic performance of Olympic proportions. It’s able to attack switchback country roads with speed and agility, seemingly building confidence with each corner, straight and pavement drop.

And that becomes a snapshot of the whole Mazda6 ownership experience. It thrills the driver who wants to explore beyond the mundane city/highway driving routine – the driver who tries the Rocky Road, you might say.

Summary:

Year/Make/Model
2010 Mazda6
Price as tested
$39,290
Trim level
V6 GT
Price range
$23,195-$36,695
Freight
$1,595
Options
Navigation system ($2,595)
EnerGuide fuel economy ratings
12.1 L/100km city; 8.0 L/100km hwy
Observed fuel economy
9.5 L/100km combined over 1,090 km
Warranty (basic)
3 years/ 80,000 km
Warranty (powertrain)
5 years/100,000 km
Competitors
Chevrolet Malibu; Chrysler Sebring; Dodge Avenger; Ford Fusion; Honda Accord; Hyundai Sonata; Kia Magentis; Mitsubishi Galant; Nissan Altima; Toyota Camry; Volkswagen Passat.

Strong Points

Weak Points

  • - handling
  • - looks
  • - power
  • - economy
  • - interior room

Editors Rating:

Fuel consumption
below average in the segment
Value for price
fully equipped but still more costly than rivals
Styling
a stand-out in a segment known for blandness
Comfort
appropriate room but good comfort
Performance
considerably better power and handling than competitors
overall
refreshing mix of performance and styling for this segment

More Reviews

Test Drives

Kia bares its Soul to youthful buyers

Used Models

Saturn is now an orphan brand

Test Drives

Prius V expands on hybrid sensibilities

Test Drives

Special Boxster's back in Black

Test Drives

The business casual approach to a work truck

Test Drives

Fiat raises the cute factor by 500

SUBSCRIBE or Unsubscribe