2010 Mercedes-Benz GLK350

2010 Mercedes-Benz GLK350

More Photos

Photos by -Autonet.ca
Joe Duarte
Published: 05 01 2010

All weather baby Benz

Given their druthers, people won’t choose small fuel efficient cars over hulking utility vehicles, they will take smaller more fuel-efficient utilities. And why not?

There’s nothing as efficient for carrying people and stuff as a box; and, there’s nothing that will get your people and stuff over more snowdrifts and down mucky trails than a box with good clearance and good traction at all four corners. And it’s even better if companies can make them look more like cars and less like an urban assault vehicles.

The old adage about bigger and better apparently doesn’t apply to utility vehicles, which are actually getting smaller and better.

Mercedes offers a good example of this design path. It used to have a Gelandewagen (cross country vehicle – the German equivalent of the Land Rover or Jeep) for decades before it came to North America as the G-Class. But first, it introduced a smaller M-Class it thought better suited to our tastes and needs.

Now, it brings in smaller-yet GLK-Class to better fit in with changing needs and wants.

Available in just one trim level for now (GLK350), the vehicle is about what you’d expect from a compact SUV – it’s got comfortable room for four with acceptable room for five; it has a generous trunk area that expands to cavernous when you flip down the 60/40 split rear seatbacks; and it has roof rails to accommodate all those things that can’t ride inside on adventures – but with typical Mercedes flair.

It adds leather surfaces, rich wood trim, power controls aplenty, automatic climate control, heated seats all around, voice controls over most-used functions like phone and radio, and storage area under the cargo-floor (which can be used to store other cargo-friendly items such as safety and cargo nets and a fold-up cargo box.

I don’t believe there’s another current utility vehicle that has all the possibilities of the GLK350 and certainly no other in the compact class. The downside is that there’s a price to pay for all this versatility, and in the GLK that price is performance.

Perhaps uncharacteristic of the Tri-star brand, the GLK trails its competitors (badly, in some areas). Not only is its engine less powerful than nearly all its competitors, but it’s also less economical.

Power comes on sluggishly, most likely a result of the seven-speed automatic’s insistence on starting out in second gear, and during your travels you’re going to stop for fuel more often because it’s rated worse than its competitors and it uses a smaller fuel tank. And then you’re asked to fill it up with the premium stuff!

The transmission itself offers a smooth transition between gears, though it is not remarkably quiet with a fair amount of gear noise making it into the cabin. Surprisingly, the sixth and seventh gears don’t seem to contribute a lot toward fuel efficiency on the highway. Some competitors with larger and similarly-sized engine do a lot more with their seven or fewer gears.

The 4Matic all wheel drive system is efficient and seamless, but that’s as it should be, and the 201 mm ground clearance (eight inches) would make it less likely to get stuck in deep snow or rutted off-road trails.

That higher floor does offer a bit more of a step up into the cabin, which in the rear makes it more challenging due to relatively small door openings.

Also uncharacteristic of Mercedes, the price is lower than that of its competitors, though Mercedes has been very aggressive with its price points over the past (credit crunched) year.

All that is likely to insure success for the GLK350, especially in the wintery wonderland, summer-getaway kind of driving life we embrace in Canada.

Summary:

Year/Make/Model
2010 Mercedes-Benz GLK350
Price as tested
$49,040
Price range
$41,800
Freight
$1,995
Options
Premium pkg ($2,000) includes parking assist, memory front passenger seat, power hatchdoor, 115V outlet; Comand navigation pkg ($1,800) includes voice control, hard drive-based navigation, 6-DVD changer, 4 GB MP3 storage, memory card slot for MP3 playback; panorama sunroof ($1,500); metallic paint ($800); trailer hitch ($675); USB/AUX connections ($375).
EnerGuide fuel economy ratings
13.3 L/100km city; 9.6 L/100km hwy
Observed fuel economy
12.4 L/100km combined over 409 km
Warranty (basic)
4 years/ 80,000 km
Warranty (powertrain)
4 years/ 80,000 km
Competitors
Acura RDX; Audi Q5; BMW X3; Infiniti EX35; Land Rover LR2

Strong Points

Weak Points

  • - cabin comfort
  • - cargo room and versatility
  • - classic looks
  • - price in class
  • - slow to launch
  • - noisy gears
  • - cabin access

Editors Rating:

Fuel consumption
not good, especially in light of competitors
Value for price
kind of pricey, but cheaper than competitors
Styling
classy and classic presentation in a market of jelly bean shapes
Comfort
suitably roomy considering its size
Performance
sluggish and noisy is not good for a vehicle from a luxury maker
overall
nothing noteworthy; would be better with just a bit more ooomph

More Reviews

Test Drives

Kia bares its Soul to youthful buyers

Used Models

Saturn is now an orphan brand

Test Drives

Prius V expands on hybrid sensibilities

Test Drives

Special Boxster's back in Black

Test Drives

The business casual approach to a work truck

Test Drives

Fiat raises the cute factor by 500

SUBSCRIBE or Unsubscribe