2011 Mitsubishi RVR

2011 Mitsubishi RVR

More Photos

Photos by -Autonet.ca
JOE DUARTE
Published: 25 03 2011

Cute RVR keys in on the ute

The 2011 Mitsubishi RVR brings up the question: what’s the most important characteristic of a sport cute? The cute or the ute?

In a way, the RVR (which is known as Outlander Sport south of the border to tie it to Mitsubishi’s more established seven-seat compact ute) is a throwback to the original cute utes – the Toyota Rav4 and Honda CR-V – whose tiny bodies still kept the main SUV trait of utility. They got their nicknames because they were tiny versions of full-sized SUVs (as in: “look how tiny it is … that’s so cute!”) not because they were particularly good looking.

View available trims for the 2011 Mitsubishi RVR.

Since then, though, companies seem to have gone on a mission to make their compact SUVs as cute as possible, to the general detriment of utility, and we have some really good looking vehicles (think Nissan Juke, Hyundai Tucson and even the latest CR-V) that have sacrificed a bit of utility for their overall looks.

The RVR doesn’t do that. It still has relatively good looking face, but the rest of the body keeps the boxy shape that has served the SUV segment so well over the decades. You may hear some companies spout off about how much larger their hatch openings are than that of competitors, but if the largeness comes at the cost of clearance, what does it matter?

The RVR is easy to load up and stack up with cargo. The hatch gate opens up high so even taller people will have a tough time knocking their heads and the room behind the rear seats is plentiful for a couple weeks’ provisions; the seatbacks go down in a 60/40 split to incrementally expand the room to fit longer, larger or more items, at the cost of passengers.

The rear seat room itself is relatively generous on the legs and heads, again thanks to the upright boxy shape. Shoulder to shoulder room is ok for three, if one of them is small (though foot position is compromised by the driveshaft tunnel), and very comfortable for two. The seats are well padded, if not well defined, so passengers back there will move around quite a bit if the driver is more aggressive with the handling.

The front seats are better bolstered, and there are quite a few spots around them into which to drop stuff.

Power is supplied by a 2.0-litre four cylinder engine that puts out 148 hp and has variable valve timing to improve power and reduce fuel consumption. It’s ok as a power source since the vehicle is relatively light but when you load up on passengers, it gets pretty sluggish pretty quickly. Mind you, it doesn’t help that it’s controlled by a continuously variable transmission, though the addition of manually selected steps (they’d be gears if the transmission had gears) helps somewhat when you want to get the power you need.

You can get into a front wheel drive RVR for under $20,000 (and a manual one, at that) but by the time you add all wheel drive (and the required CVT) you’re up to $25,000.

An electronic transfer case, allows the adaption of the all-wheel drive according to the conditions – tarmac, gravel or snow – through a rotary knob on the centre console. Even though I have the vehicle during a snowy week and I take it onto a gravel road for photography, I keep it in Tarmac mode the entire time and it does just fine.

And really, that’s what I’d want from a downsized SUV – room to carry the stuff I want to carry, and the ability to get me where I want to go. Add in a dollop of style to go along with those two requirements, and I and my cute ute will get along just fine.

Summary:

Year/Make/Model
2011 Mitsubishi RVR
Price as tested
$24,998
Trim level
SE AWC
EnerGuide fuel economy ratings
8.4 L/100km city; 6.6 L/100km hwy
Observed fuel economy
9.0 L/100km over 769 km
Warranty (basic)
5 years/ 100,000 km
Warranty (powertrain)
10 years/ 160,000 km
Competitors
Chevrolet Equinox; Dodge Nitro; Ford Escape; Honda CR-V; Hyundai Tucson; Kia Sportage; Mazda Tribute; Nissan Rogue; Toyota Rav4; Volkswagen Tiguan

Strong Points

Weak Points

  • - price
  • - warranty
  • - utility
  • - CVT
  • - rear seatback support

Editors Rating:

Fuel consumption
quite good for its intentions but average for the segment.
Value for price
pretty good package for under 25K.
Styling
traditional but not boring.
Comfort
good space utilization considering the size.
Performance
probably better with the manual tranny but then no AWD.
overall
manages to balance utility with style.

More Reviews

Test Drives

Harley-Davidson F-150 rides high on the hog

Test Drives

Mercedes C350 strikes heroic sport sedan stance

Test Drives

Cadillac SRX puts a premium on wagon

Test Drives

Lexus stakes luxury sport compact claim with...

Test Drives

Honda CR-V hasn't outgrown its britches

Test Drives

Best BMW 3 improves threefold on driving fun

Test Drives

Kia heads to Rio for sub-compact sedan competitor

SUBSCRIBE or Unsubscribe