2011 Nissan Quest

2011 Nissan Quest

More Photos

Photos by -Autonet.ca
JOE DUARTE
Published: 02 06 2011

Quest takes Nissan minivan in new direction

The 2012 Nissan Quest is a far more boxy and utilitarian vehicle than the model it replaces, which is a good thing for a minivan; it’s just that Nissan seems to de-excite the Quest at a time when competitors are getting a little bit bolder with their styling.

A little history – Quest started off as a joint venture with Ford in 1993, which marketed a rebadged version as the Mercury Villager. At the time, Quest/Villager was the smallest in the segment. A 1999 redesign made it larger and acquired dual sliding doors, before a complete overhaul for 2004 made it one of the funkiest minivan designs in years (complete with a table-top like centrestack and perhaps the first inclusion of skylights in a production vehicle). That generation was built off the Altima platform in Mississippi. The new Quest is built in Japan off a modified Altima platform, alongside the Japanese market Elgrand (which previously used a different platform).

Search available trim options for the 2011 Nissan Quest.

Although it carries the new Nissan look, the new van is slightly smaller overall than the model it replaces (though the squared off panels actually make it look bigger) – overall length is down four inches and the wheelbase is shortened by six. Overall length stays the same (mostly to avoid the tall skinny look of minivans in other world markets) and height is down about a half inch).

But in reworking the body, Nissan also gained a ton of usable space in Quest. There is no better utilitarian shape than a box and the new Quest is boxy (further emphasized by squared off windows and a nearly perpendicular finish). Ironically, the new Honda Odyssey adds a kink to its belt-line, similar to the wave in the previous generation Quest’s, but the new Quest beltline was obviously penned with a straight edge.

The cabin benefits from all this squaring off, though. The trunk space behind the third row seats is good enough for several overnight bags or a couple golf bags, and the rear and middle rows go down flat forward to the load floor (the rear in 50/50 split and the middle individual seats by removing the headrests). By not having the rear seats tumble back into a well, there is covered underfloor storage available to keep valuables secured away.

Darkly tinted windows add to the privacy and help keep the interior cool on sunny days, and there are optional sunroofs over our tester’s front and middle seats whose light tan upholstery adds to the cabin airiness. The leather covering the upright seats is supple over supportive padding that’s comfortable on backs and legs, although you do have to play with seat positions in order to benefit all users. You can claim enough legroom for adults in the rear seat, though I’m not sure you’d want to squeeze three of them back there.

Ride is comfortable over all surfaces and as with most utility vehicles, loading it up actually takes the edge out of the suspension. Unladen, there is the indicative Nissan handling manners, though I don’t try to push the Quest in my test period. The latest iteration of the vaunted VQ engine displaces 3.5-litres in Quest, and it makes 260 horsepower and 240 lb.-ft. of torque at a relatively high 4400 rpm. That means that you have enough power to get you around, but not a lot of it to get you going in a hurry from a standstill, which is further exacerbated by a continuously variable transmission.

But, this is a minivan and you don’t want to inflict excessive G-forces on the kids on the way to soccer practice, right?

You can get a decent traditional minivan for under $30,000, though our fully-loaded test LE starts at nearly $48,500, and tops $50 grand by the time we add the dual moonroofs. That’s kind of high for a practical family vehicle.

Summary:

Year/Make/Model
2011 Nissan Quest
Price as tested
$50,498
Trim level
LE
Freight
$1,650
Options
Dual moonroofs ($2,000).
EnerGuide fuel economy ratings
11.1 L/100km city; 8.1 L/100km hwy
Observed fuel economy
10.8 L/100km over 911 km
Warranty (basic)
3 years/60,000 km
Warranty (powertrain)
5 years/100,000 k
Competitors
Chrysler Town & Country; Dodge Grand Caravan; Honda Odyssey; Kia Sedona; Toyota Sienna; Volkswagen Routan

Strong Points

Weak Points

  • - utilitarian shape and features
  • - seating comfort
  • - access
  • - price
  • - styling

Editors Rating:

Fuel consumption
not bad for a two tonne vehicle
Value for price
minivans have to cost less in order to survive
Styling
utilitarian but all the flash is gone
Comfort
with some fiddling there's comfort for all seats
Performance
not in the same league as Odyssey and Sienna
overall
improved in all utility facets makes it blend right into the segment

More Reviews

Test Drives

Harley-Davidson F-150 rides high on the hog

Test Drives

Mercedes C350 strikes heroic sport sedan stance

Test Drives

Cadillac SRX puts a premium on wagon

Test Drives

Lexus stakes luxury sport compact claim with...

Test Drives

Honda CR-V hasn't outgrown its britches

Test Drives

Best BMW 3 improves threefold on driving fun

Test Drives

Kia heads to Rio for sub-compact sedan competitor

SUBSCRIBE or Unsubscribe